Effect of naproxen on gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal function: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

نویسندگان

  • J M Scheiman
  • P M Patel
  • E K Henson
  • T T Nostrant
چکیده

OBJECTIVES Gastrointestinal symptoms, particularly pyrosis, complicate nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. NSAIDs cause esophageal injury, and H2 blockers are often prescribed for, and successfully control, NSAID-related symptoms. To determine whether NSAIDs can induce gastroesophageal reflux, we studied the effect of a commonly used NSAID, naproxen, on reflux parameters and esophageal function. METHODS Nine healthy volunteers (five males, four females, age 23-34 yr) were studied. After basal measurements were taken, the subjects randomly received naproxen 500 mg p.o. b.i.d. or placebo for 1 wk. On day 6, the subjects underwent esophageal manometry with a water-perfused system and Dent sleeve. Body pressures, contraction velocity, and duration of contraction were recorded in the distal 7 cm of the esophagus. The lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) and number of transient relaxations (TLESRs) were monitored. This was followed by 24-h pH monitoring. The subjects then crossed over to the other drug after a minimum 14-day wash-out period. RESULTS No subject experienced any GI symptoms during the study. One subject developed reflux-induced symptoms a few months after completing the study and was excluded from the analysis. The total fraction of time (pH < 4) was 4.9 +/- 1.0% in the basal state, 5.5 +/- 1.4% on placebo, and 5.4 +/- 1.5% on naproxen. These differences were not significant. The number of reflux episodes and the esophageal clearance time were not affected by naproxen. The LESP in the basal state was 32.1 +/- 5.6 mm Hg, 32.3 +/- 4.2 mm Hg on placebo, and 29.9 +/- 3.3 mm Hg on naproxen (p = NS). The number of TLESRs per 30 minutes in the basal state was 3.5 +/- 0.9, 4.6 +/- 1.2 on placebo, and 5.8 +/- 1.0 on naproxen (p = NS). The speed and duration of contractions were not affected by naproxen. The excluded subject had marked basal reflux (total fraction of time pH < 4 = 10.7%), low LESP (8 mm Hg), and a marked increase in reflux on naproxen (total fraction of time pH < 4 = 53%). CONCLUSIONS Naproxen did not induce reflux in normal subjects, although reflux did increase in some subjects. Naproxen had no significant effect on motility parameters. Our data suggest that NSAIDs do not impair the anti-reflux barrier or induce reflux. Pyrosis experienced during NSAID use may not arise from the esophagus or may reflect altered esophageal sensitivity. A single subject with decreased LESP and asymptomatic increased acid exposure in the basal state had a marked increase in reflux on naproxen. This person subsequently developed symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux. The effect of NSAIDs on individuals with a propensity to reflux deserves further study.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Effect of a Combination of Omeprazole Plus Sustained Release Baclofen Versus Omeprazole Alone on Symptoms of Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

Previous studies have reported the efficacy of baclofen in the treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Diseases (GERD). The objective of present study is to evaluate the effect of co-administration of omeprazole 20 mg/d plus sustained Release baclofen (SR baclofen) vs omeprazole 20 mg/d plus placebo on alleviation of symptoms in patients with a diagnosis of GERD. A prospective, double blind, place...

متن کامل

Effect of a Combination of Omeprazole Plus Sustained Release Baclofen Versus Omeprazole Alone on Symptoms of Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

Previous studies have reported the efficacy of baclofen in the treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Diseases (GERD). The objective of present study is to evaluate the effect of co-administration of omeprazole 20 mg/d plus sustained Release baclofen (SR baclofen) vs omeprazole 20 mg/d plus placebo on alleviation of symptoms in patients with a diagnosis of GERD. A prospective, double blind, place...

متن کامل

Evaluation of pantoprazol treatment response of patients with asthma and gastroesophageal reflux: a randomized prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVES To determine the effect that the treatment of GERD has on the clinical management, as well as the respiratory function, of patients with asthma and to evaluate the clinical characteristics of this group of patients. METHODS Patients with asthma and concomitant GERD, documented using 24 h pH-metry, were evaluated by means of quality of life questionnaires, as well as questionnaires ...

متن کامل

Effect of cisapride on postprandial gastro-oesophageal reflux.

We studied the effect of cisapride on oesophageal motor function and postprandial gastro-oesophageal reflux in a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled crossover study. In 16 patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux, cisapride 10 mg orally and placebo were studied on separate days according to identical protocols. Cisapride and placebo were given 30 minutes before a standard me...

متن کامل

Therapeutic Effect of Co-Administration of Amantadine and Aspirin on Fatigue in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Study

Fatigue is recognized as one of the most disabling and frequent symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Amantadine appears to have some proven ability to alleviate the fatigue in MS. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of co-administration of amantadine and aspirin for the treatment of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Forty-five ambulatory patients aged 20–50 years with a diagnosis of M...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The American journal of gastroenterology

دوره 90 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1995